Your address will show here +12 34 56 78
Uncategorized

2019 has come and has nearly gone. It was an excellent yr for early traders. However it might have been so significantly better. If solely sure issues had zigged as a substitute of zagged. Subsequent yr, I’m hoping for extra zigging and fewer zagging. So listed here are my eight needs (one for every day of Hanukkah) to make that occur in 2020…

1. A bitcoin ETF. Is that this an excessive amount of to ask? I don’t assume so. Then once more, I don’t work for the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC). And the SEC has been fairly clear that it is an excessive amount of to ask. The largest drawback? The SEC doesn’t belief the bitcoin market. The best way the SEC sees it, the bitcoin markets are full of pretend quantity and actual manipulation. It’s flawed. However that’s the way in which the SEC sees it. And that makes it nervous. Subsequent yr, we’ll see extra bitcoin futures platforms… extra spinoff contracts… and extra quantity on the spot market. Derivatives merchandise are additionally extra tightly regulated than the underlying spot market. All of this could assist regulators develop into extra comfy with digital asset buying and selling and approving its first bitcoin ETF.

2. Extra readability on the legality of preliminary coin providing (ICO) raises. When is a token a safety and when is it not? Unbelievably, it’s nonetheless not clear. And we will’t depend on laws to make issues any clearer subsequent yr. So I’m wishing for the courts to step in. In circumstances like U.S. Securities and Alternate Fee v. Kik Interactive, it’s fairly attainable that the judiciary will additional outline how primary securities-related doctrines just like the Howey Check apply to crypto tokens and ICO raises.

3. Hester Peirce for SEC chairman. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce started her takedown of the SEC’s choice to reject a bitcoin exchange-traded fund proposed by the Winklevoss twins with the three easy, but highly effective phrases – “I respectfully dissent.” She accurately identified that if the SEC’s argument was utilized to different commodities, there can be no ETFs monitoring the value of gold or oil. Alas, present SEC Chairman Jay Clayton’s time period expires the yr after subsequent. And it may be prolonged an extra 18 months. This want is strictly wishful considering.

4. Extra liberal accredited investor {qualifications}. I’ve made this want yearly for the previous 5 years or so. I make it as a result of I hear rumors yearly that the SEC is contemplating increasing its necessities for accredited investor standing. Proper now, traders must both make $200,000 a yr or present a web price of greater than $1 million (excluding most important residence). This yr, the rumors appear somewhat extra grounded in reality. The SEC lately issued a gathering discover that stated its “accredited investor” revisions “are supposed to replace and enhance the definition with the intention to establish extra successfully traders that don’t want the protections of registration below the Securities Act of 1933.” From research the SEC has made previously, meaning contemplating an individual’s investing expertise, training or particular coaching. 2020 could possibly be the yr this truly occurs.

5. Nailing Purdue for $15 billion. Purdue Pharma, greater than every other firm, was accountable for launching the lethal opioid epidemic. Purdue constructed its advertising and marketing marketing campaign across the lie that dependancy charges in sufferers had been extraordinarily low and that physicians who denied sufferers opioids had been merely permitting their sufferers to endure. One state legal professional basic says the Sackler household, which owns Purdue, has taken $11 billion out of the corporate within the final decade. Purdue now faces greater than 2,600 federal and state lawsuits. Below a current settlement settlement, it agreed to supply plaintiffs with $Three billion. However that’s manner too low. The Sacklers ought to give again ALL the cash they made out of pushing opioids after which some. Fifteen billion {dollars} is an affordable quantity, and it needs to be nonnegotiable.

6. A experience in a flying taxi. Flying taxis, additionally known as passenger drones, are coming. Most max out at round 100 mph. They usually don’t have nice vary. They’ll cowl 60 miles to 220 miles in a single flight. However who cares? In case you can’t afford house journey (and who can?), that is the subsequent neatest thing. To make my want come true subsequent yr, I’ll most likely must go to Europe. The U.S. will see these infants fly in a few years (presumably extra) after they make their first look in Europe.

7. The demise of Fb. Fb-owned Instagram lately eliminated a publish by an artist who was crucial of the Chinese language authorities. Demise threats made towards the artist remained uncensored (Instagram later restored the art work). Fb apologized, claiming that the censorship was attributable to “a mistake.” All we get from Fb is unhealthy habits and apologies. Sufficient. No single firm ought to have this a lot management over what we learn and see on our screens. Now Fb’s development has slowed. And I’m ready for a dynamic social media platform constructed on a blockchain platform to take its place. These platforms will let customers management and shield their very own knowledge. Their time has come.

8. A $5 million improve to Regulation Crowdfunding. Below Regulation Crowdfunding, firms are allowed to lift solely $1 million. That’s simply not sufficient. And it hurts the attraction of crowdfunding for dozens of seed-stage firms. I’ve seen laws that proposes elevating the restrict to $5 million, however we shouldn’t have to attend for an act of Congress. The SEC can provoke this modification by itself with out congressional approval. Seed firms normally want greater than $1 million to succeed in Collection A funding. It makes an excessive amount of sense for each startup founders and early-stage traders for this NOT to occur.

I’m certain a few of my needs will come true in 2020. 2019 was a fairly good yr. With somewhat want success, 2020 could possibly be even higher.

0

Uncategorized

Tokopedia, an Indonesia-based e-commerce market, is reportedly within the last phases of closing an funding spherical valued at round $1.5 billion from Japan’s Softbank, China’s Alibaba Group and Singapore-based Temasek.

The Tokopedia market, which is notably the most important of its form in Indonesia, is now on monitor to turn into one of many greatest unicorns within the nation following its funding spherical, proper behind Gojek, the primary Indonesia-headquartered agency to achieve a valuation of roughly $10 billion.

Tokopedia is presently working in direction of launching an preliminary public providing (IPO).

Temasek, a significant stakeholder in Gojek, will reportedly be main Tokopedia’s $1.5 billion funding spherical with a $500 million funding. Present traders Softbank and Alibaba are additionally anticipated to speculate substantial quantities.

The spherical could possibly be finalized “as quickly as subsequent quarter” of this yr. The $1.5 billion capital injection would worth Tokopedia at anyplace between $eight billion and $9 billion, based on sources accustomed to the matter. The agency was valued at $7 billion in 2018.

This improvement got here only a few days after Tokopedia’s president Patrick Cao instructed Nikkei Asian Overview that the agency is planning to checklist in its house (Indonesian) market and in addition within the US throughout the subsequent three years.

Cao famous:

“If you wish to go for the worldwide investor profile, plus expertise experience and depth when it comes to capital then the US [is the ideal market for that,] contemplating our peer group as effectively – Alibaba, Amazon – these guys are all listed [in] the US.”

Nuraini Razak, VP of company communications at Tokopedia, stated that large tech had “already mapped out, deliberate, and ready the suitable preparations wanted” for the agency’s IPO. Nonetheless, Razak didn’t say whether or not the US could be its subsequent marketplace for listings.

Tech large Amazon can be anticipated to enter Indonesia’s e-commerce business. It now seems that corporations are starting to really feel the strain to lift funds, consolidate and strengthen their presence within the nation.

0

Uncategorized

After elevating over $1.three million on Kickstarter from over 20,000 backers in 2016, the builders behind the remake of System Shock introduced that the venture is now on hiatus.

Nightdive Studios, a growth crew recognized for remaking traditional video games, introduced Friday that its venture to remake System Shock is on hiatus as they attempt to get the venture again on observe. The announcement, written by CEO Stephen Kick, says that the studio strayed from its growth path and tried to do an excessive amount of.

When System Shock initially got here out in 1994, it was considered probably the most revolutionary first-person shooters of all time and served as inspiration for later video games like Bioshock and Useless Area

Nightdive Studios initially promised to remake System Shock in 2016 with a Kickstarter objective of $900,000. The studio gave comparatively frequent updates on the progress of the sport, so the revelation that the venture is happening hiatus might have come as a little bit of a shock to backers. 

Kick, who takes duty for the standing of the remake, stated the crew’s imaginative and prescient started to vary throughout growth.

“We moved from a remaster to a very new recreation,” he wrote. “We shifted engines from Unity to Unreal, a selection that we don’t remorse and one which has labored out for us. With the swap we started envisioning doing extra, however straying from the core ideas of the unique title… The extra that we labored on the sport, the extra that we needed to do, and the additional we received from the unique ideas that made System Shock so nice.”

Sadly, the assertion didn’t embrace any particulars about how lengthy the hiatus will final, however Kick needed to guarantee backers that the venture isn’t canceled.

“We’re taking a break, however NOT ending the venture,” he wrote. “Please settle for my private assurance that we are going to be again and stronger than ever. System Shock goes to be accomplished and all of our guarantees fulfilled.”

0

Uncategorized

Whitney Cummings is known for making failure her bitch.

After working for greater than fifteen years on this planet’s of comedy and leisure, Cummings has written, directed, produced and starred in films and TV reveals, launched a number of comedy specials, appeared in comedy roasts, discuss reveals, and has in the end been capable of form a profession reflecting her blunt feminist perspective.

She just lately premiered her podcast, Good For You, the place she interviews celebrities, comics, and buddies, and in addition launched her fourth comedy particular Can I Contact It? on Netflix. Oh, and she or he’s simply joined a brand new social media platform referred to as Tik Tok, which can or is probably not on its method to changing Instagram in social media recognition.

“I don’t consider in failure. I simply don’t assume that’s an actual factor, as a result of it’s all observe.”

Given simply how a lot Whitney has helped shift the dialog round how girls can and may behave in public (and onstage) it’s not shocking she’s been met together with her fair proportion of pushback, criticism, and failure alongside the best way. Happily for us, none of this has slowed her down. “I don’t consider in failure,” Cummings defined in a latest interview following her look at Patreon Meeting, a summit targeted on celebrating the inventive class. “I simply don’t assume that’s an actual factor, as a result of it’s all observe.”

“Perhaps as a result of I’m a comic and we sublimate all ostensible failures into jokes,” she continued. “However very early on I noticed: ‘Oh my god, my errors and my failures are… going to pay for my mortgage.’” Cummings stated that she views errors as one thing she will be able to “alchemize into artwork,” and factors out one of the best tales often contain the method of remodeling disasters, catastrophes, and nightmares into one thing larger and higher.

”Oh my god, my errors and my failures are going to pay for my mortgage.”

In dialog with comic and actor Paul Scheer at Patreon Meeting, the 2 comics — who initially met within the pre-social media period whereas working collectively on reveals for MTV and VH1 within the early 2000s — mentioned how with the ability to join immediately with followers has empowered creators and adjusted the leisure business.

Getting excited over the brand new wave of social media brilliance that’s cropping up on apps like Tik Tok, when requested if she had any regrets or concerning the arc of her profession, Cummings admitted she wished she’d embraced know-how extra significantly years in the past, and brought benefit of how new platforms let creators immediately join with their fanbase. “I want I had simply completed a podcast sooner,” Cummings stated. “I want I had taken Instagram critical sooner. I want I had taken what I believed have been ephemeral social media fads significantly sooner. I want I had spent extra time connecting with followers one on one as an alternative of making an attempt to impress networks.”

“I want I had spent extra time connecting with followers one on one as an alternative of making an attempt to impress networks.”

Nonetheless, it’s not like Cummings didn’t fare nicely when working with networks, too. An enormous a part of her success was as a consequence of creating the CBS sitcom 2 Broke Women again in 2011, which ran for six seasons right through 2017 and put her on the map as not only a comedian or an actor, however a producer. In the long run, although, a few of her most significant work as a creator has come not from creating fictional tales however telling the story of her personal life — whether or not it’s on stage or in a distinct format.

“It took me 5 – 6 years to even say one thing true on stage,” she stated. “I believed I needed to like, write jokes, and though that was a method that I love and love and discover actually humorous, it wasn’t one thing that wore rather well on me. So it took me some time to determine what I used to be going to speak about on stage.”

“It took me 5 – 6 years to even say one thing true on stage”

And nonetheless, the ghosts of failure, criticism, and catastrophe can loom round any nook, maybe resonating much more painfully for creators like Cummings who work from a private place — that’s simply a part of the cycle of threat and reward that every one creators face. However notably as a lady, Cummings desires to spotlight how the taking part in subject continues to be gendered in a manner that impacts each single business, each side of public life. It isn’t simply feminine comics who face heckling and harassment, or simply in leisure that it’s robust — it’s in every single place.

“I believe it’s simply exhausting to be a lady in each subject, on a regular basis,” she stated. “I don’t assume being referred to as a whore, or advised you look previous, otherwise you’re busted or requested why don’t you’ve gotten children and why aren’t you married — sadly, I believe all girls must take care of that — not simply those which are telling jokes onstage. I don’t wish to decrease all the ladies in each subject who must undergo it by saying it solely occurs to me as a result of I discuss to strangers at evening with a microphone.”

Even after realizing that her personal life experiences have been one thing that resonated with quite a lot of different folks on this planet — particularly different girls — among the subject material she needed to debate was nonetheless slightly tough for Cummings to handle. Studying easy methods to shift modalities when it got here to totally different varieties of fabric, and trusting that audiences can be open to that, is one thing concerning the present inventive period she’s grown to understand.

Alongside together with her just lately launched podcast, she’s beforehand written two books — Emotional Ninja in 2013, and I’m High quality… and Different White Lies, printed in 2017 — and these extra eliminated inventive codecs, particularly, permit her to deal with probably risky points.

“There are quite a lot of issues I wasn’t snug speaking about as a standup onstage,” she admitted, “however I used to be snug placing in a e book. I talked about habit, I talked about codependence, I talked about sexual assault. That’s one thing that onstage I simply couldn’t get snug with for some purpose. And on my podcast, I can do it, and in a e book, I may do it, so I believe that I’m so grateful that there are such a lot of methods to be inventive now.”

0

For Eileen O’Sullivan, being identified with breast most cancers in 2013 was the catalyst for a deluge of distinctly unscientific and ceaselessly harmful recommendation. An funding supervisor with a analytical thoughts, she started searching for data to higher perceive her doubtlessly life-altering situation. However from the second Eileen beginning looking out on-line, misinformation was unavoidable: “That is when all of the options begin rolling in,” she says. “Earlier than prognosis, I had by no means heard of crank remedies for most cancers: herbs, dietary supplements, diets, juicing, clear consuming, homeopathy, important oils, nor adverts for abroad different most cancers clinics. I actually didn’t go in search of them, however I obtained limitless prompts based mostly on key phrases comparable to breast most cancers. I used to be additionally inundated with kin and mates popping out with crackpot therapies – and even from different sufferers in chemo wards and ready rooms.”

As a most cancers researcher deeply concerned in science outreach, I can attest that few topics provoke fairly the emotional response that most cancers does. There may be not a household on this planet untouched by the illness, and the phrase itself is sufficient to induce a way of concern in even the hardiest amongst us. Most cancers is oppressive and all-pervasive: half of us alive as we speak will expertise a direct brush with it. However regardless of its ubiquity, it stays poorly understood and falsehoods round it will probably thrive.

On-line, doubtful claims about most cancers are rife, from outright “cures” to assertions of a conspiracy to suppress “the reality” about it. In 2016, greater than half of the 20 most shared most cancers articles on Fb consisted of medically discredited claims. And this goes far past Fb – the Wall Road Journal just lately revealed that YouTube was internet hosting accounts with 1000’s of subscribers that promoted bogus most cancers remedies. O’Sullivan’s scepticism gave her some immunity to the lure of empty guarantees. However having misplaced her mom to breast most cancers, “concern left me extra susceptible to pseudoscience than I’d care to confess”, she says.

She is now a passionate affected person advocate, steering others away from damaging falsehoods – an issue she sees as unrelenting. This grim evaluation chimes with the observations made by Dr Robert O’Connor of the Irish Most cancers Society: “Virtually all sufferers are uncovered to misinformation, [coming] from well-meaning however misinformed family members to a plethora of exploitative and profiteering sources on social media”.

A fast net search reveals ostensible remedies starting from the vaguely scientific-sounding to the profoundly esoteric. The US Meals and Drug Administration’s (FDA) non-exhaustive checklist of debunked claims numbers greater than 187, whereas Wikipedia’s checklist of bogus cures run from “energy-based” to “religious therapeutic”. Different claims contain hyperbaric oxygen remedy, hashish oil, shark cartilage, ketogenic diets and baking soda.

There may be growing concern that such fictions danger eclipsing respected data. Macmillan Most cancers Help just lately appointed a nurse particularly to debunk on-line tales, prompting the Lancet Oncology to remark: “How has society obtained thus far, the place unproven interventions are being chosen rather than evidence-based, efficient remedies? Sadly, disinformation and – frankly – lies are extensively propagated and with the identical magnitude as verified proof.”

Related issues are echoed by Most cancers Analysis UK in addition to the Wellcome Belief. New sufferers particularly are sometimes focused by these pushing most cancers “cures”, and whereas a few of these are effectively that means however misguided, others are commercially pushed. Sonya Canavan, one other most cancers survivor, famous: “Within the breast most cancers affected person discussion board I used to submit on, I usually noticed ‘sufferers’ posting about every kind of quackery, who turned out to be salespeople trawling for enterprise.”

That pseudoscience is being hawked to susceptible sufferers isn’t a brand new downside – most cancers scams have existed for many years, and combating them was the impetus behind the 1939 Most cancers Act. The substantial distinction now could be the convenience with which falsehoods might be disseminated. Most cancers surgeon David Gorski, professor of surgical procedure and oncology on the Wayne State College Faculty of Medication in Detroit, Michigan and managing editor of the web journal Science-Primarily based Medication, notes that most cancers misinformation is “far more prevalent now for a similar purpose different misinformation and conspiracy theories are so prevalent – as a result of they’re so simply unfold on social media.”

Whether or not born out of a want to assist, or bare charlatanism, the web affect of such misinformation is overwhelmingly destructive. Sufferers engaged with unproved remedies for most cancers usually tend to reject typical therapy, or delay life-saving interventions. This comes at a horrible price; sufferers who subscribe to different approaches are greater than twice as more likely to die in the identical interval as those that depend on typical therapies. Worse once more, it’s not unusual for promoters of doubtful data to resort to scaremongering over typical remedy. Each radiotherapy and chemotherapy are ceaselessly dismissed as “poisons”, imperilling lives. Most cancers is scary, and guarantees of easy cures might be alluring.

Stanislaw Burzynski in 1997
Stanislaw Burzynski in 1997 on the federal courthouse in Houston, Texas, the place he confronted 34 costs of mail fraud, which have been dismissed, and 41 of violating FDA rules, upon which the jury failed to succeed in a verdict. {Photograph}: Pat Sullivan/AP

All false claims betray the identical fundamental misunderstanding, nevertheless: most cancers is just not a monolithic entity, however a household of greater than 200 recognized ailments. Arising from mutations in a affected person’s cells, most cancers is extraordinarily advanced and various. It’s extremely unlikely {that a} single “magic bullet” may deal with most cancers in all its varieties. The concept of a panacea is engaging, however woefully misguided, and a klaxon warning of doubtful science. Unscientific interventions can however include substantial value tags.

Primarily based in his Texas clinic, Stanislaw Burzynski claims to treatment most cancers with a singular “antineoplaston” remedy. Regardless of working for many years, in response to the US Nationwide Most cancers Institute (NCI) “different investigators have been unable to duplicate these outcomes”. Since its inception, the clinic has been the topic of quite a few FDA warnings but continues to advertise itself as able to curing sufferers. And it doesn’t come low cost – the US NCI warns sufferers that therapy prices upwards of $7,500-$10,00Zero month-to-month (£5,600-£7,580) and says: “The proof to be used of antineoplaston remedy as a therapy for most cancers is inconclusive. Managed scientific trials are essential to assess the worth of this remedy.”

Regardless of destructive publicity, it’s enterprise as normal for Burzynski. If something, crowdfunding could have made his clinic extra common. In lieu of scientific proof, it depends on gushing testimonials to lure new clients, although in some instances, these come from sufferers already deceased – a reality absent from the promotional materials.

That is contemptible, however under no circumstances distinctive – there’s an abundance of doubtful clinics worldwide promising the unattainable at eye-watering costs. Final 12 months an investigation on Irish tv probed clinics in Istanbul that have been claiming big successes with unconventional therapies. Sufferers have been charged greater than €130,000 (£116,000) and given the all-clear in Turkey. In response to the programme, sufferers found their cancers had progressed markedly when scanned after returning dwelling. Germany, too, is dwelling to a number of successfully unregulated clinics, introduced as luxurious spas however promising cures. These are backed by fawning testimonials pitched at worldwide clients, with remedies costing a whole bunch of 1000’s of euros – regardless of no proof for his or her efficacy.

Such exploitation goes far past the fast victims, with crowdfunding sometimes used to fulfill their exorbitant costs. A paper within the British Medical Journal final 12 months, based mostly on figures collected by the Good Pondering Society, discovered that at the very least £8m had been raised since 2012 within the UK alone for unsubstantiated or discredited most cancers remedies. As Good Pondering Society venture director Michael Marshall explains: “Sums raised by means of crowdfunding are simply the tip of the iceberg, with many sufferers taking out loans, mortgaging their homes, and spending their life financial savings. When these supposed cures prove to supply no profit, households have been left dealing with big money owed when they’re grieving for his or her liked one.”

To elucidate the paucity of proof for his or her claims, purveyors of quack treatments accuse the medical and scientific neighborhood of suppressing cures for most cancers. This isn’t a mere fringe perception – 37% of People consider the FDA is doing simply that. However the declare is nonsense. It could require an enormous conspiracy of a whole bunch of 1000’s of scientists and docs to maintain – a situation unlikely to endure.

Plus, if there have been such a conspiracy, wouldn’t those that work within the most cancers sphere be simply as inclined to its malignant affect as anybody? All of us lose family members to most cancers, and succumb to it. Conspiracy claims foster mistrust between sufferers and healthcare groups.

The rise in most cancers misinformation is a part of a wider downside with on-line falsehoods. Just like the equally harmful explosion in anti-vaccine myths, most cancers untruths have an effect on each our bodily wellbeing and on the general public understanding of science and drugs. In a sea of sound and fury, discerning between the respected and the repugnant isn’t all the time straightforward, however there are glorious assets accessible for sufferers and their households. Properly-researched guides by Most cancers Analysis UK and the US Nationwide Most cancers Institute are enlightening and authoritative.

Like anti-vaccine sentiment, most cancers myths thrive on social media. There’s a robust argument that these platforms have an ethical obligation to take away teams and people propagating misinformation. As O’Sullivan notes, “Fb, YouTube and Twitter lead a affected person down a rabbit gap, with many considering that is ‘doing their analysis’. I don’t suppose we are able to cease these making false most cancers claims, however possibly we are able to insulate sufferers and regulate these making most cancers claims in addition to holding social media platforms accountable.”

Within the wake of a measles resurgence pushed partly by on-line anti-vaccine activism, a number of social media platforms have promised to therapeutic massage their algorithms to cut back “pretend information” on most cancers. However this filtering is definitely bypassed. Social media enterprise fashions thrive on engagement moderately than veracity, and a cynic would possibly suppose they’ve little purpose to control such content material, past showing to be involved. Whether or not the issue is absence of capacity or inclination, well being misinformation stays widespread. It’s crucial we enhance our capacity to evaluate the avalanche of medical claims: our continued wellbeing is determined by it.

Dr David Robert Grimes is a most cancers researcher, physicist and science author. Hellos first e-book, The Irrational Ape: Why Flawed Logic Places Us All at Danger, and How Essential Pondering Can Save the World, might be revealed by Simon & Schuster in September

0

You depend on Crowdability to deliver you the very best start-up offers. Now depend on us to deliver you probably the most fascinating tales and developments from the world of expertise. You gained’t discover these things within the mainstream press. Search for it each Friday morning.

With this Expertise, You Can Scale Partitions Like Spider-Man

Researchers in China have developed expertise that actually enables you to scale partitions. See it in motion right here »

Your Health Tracker Is Mendacity To You

Tens of millions of People put on Apple watches and Fitbits to observe their bodily exercise. However because it seems, these “sensible” units aren’t supplying you with the credit score you deserve. Study extra right here »

Man Tries To Commerce a Pepsi For a Fighter Jet

In 1995, Pepsi ran a promotion that allow individuals commerce “Pepsi Factors” for T-shirts and sun shades. Earn sufficient factors, and you may even win a navy fighter jet. It was Pepsi’s concept of a joke — till one soda lover took it severely. Learn the unimaginable story right here »

The Actual Cause You Don’t Train

92% of individuals swear they’d train extra — in the event that they solely had this one factor to inspire them. Discover out extra right here »

U.S. Gov’t Is Attempting To Break Into Your Telephone

Deep inside an not noticeable constructing in decrease Manhattan is a radiofrequency isolation chamber. It’s shielded by high-tech doorways designed to dam electromagnetic waves. What precisely is occurring inside? Click on right here to seek out out »

Feedback

0

Instagram
Email
Phone
Messenger
Messenger
Instagram
Phone
Email